The Year 2017

15829711594_4a40dd611c_o

LACBC’s Planning and Policy Director, Eric Bruins shares news of his meeting as 90042 resident and new LACBC Executive Director, Tamika Butler listens.

On Wednesday, February 6th, the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition held a Northeast LA Bike Ambassador meeting at the Audubon Center in Debs Park to share details of their meeting with District 1 Council Member Gil Cedillo‘s office regarding North Figueroa. At Council District 1’s request, LACBC’s Planning and Policy Director, Eric Bruins met with Gil Cedillo’s staff the first week of January just before we held a die-in outside his alleged residence. This follows the December City Council Meeting where Figueroa For All supporters went en masse to denounce his plans to prevent bike lane installation with diagonal parking. This is where Gil Cedillo responded by calling us “Bullies” for challenging him.

Bruins spoke very kindly about Team Cedillo, and how from their perspective, they came into office with the impression that they had a “clean slate,” unburdened with the already approved plans in their newly acquired district. He also mentioned that from their perspective, they are “mystified” as to why Figueroa road safety advocates are so upset.

According to Bruins, Team Cedillo is planning to apply for a May 2015 State of California Grant that could provide funding in late 2017 for Complete Streets features on North Figueroa between Avenue 55 and 60. (This section of Figueroa has already been selected to be part of Mayor Eric Garcetti’s Great Streets Intuitive.) Of the three options offered, two of them include a road diet with bicycle accommodations.

 

Team Cedillo asks advocates to give a good faith effort with images stolen from North Figueroa advocates.

Team Cedillo Phase 1 plan for five blocks of North Figueroa with help from LADOT and uncredited photographers.

 

This latest development from Gil Cedillo’s office is proposed as a pedestrian project only. (They really really dislike bikes.)  Apparently, the data on pedestrian deaths is finally getting through to them. (Maybe more cyclists have to be struck and killed on Figueroa before they start considering bikes too?) This Livable Streets awakening has inspired Team Cedillo to create a plan with help from LADOT for curb extensions on Figueroa that would reduce the crossing distances for pedestrians. By reducing the crossing distances to accommodate pedestrians, it could also create room for non-motor vehicles users such as people using bicycles in a bike lane. This approach would actually leap-frog one of the original reasons for the Figueroa buffered bike lanes in the first place: To make the road narrower so people using their feet have less area to cross in front of people using their cars. The main fiduciary difference is that the original Figueroa buffered bike lanes could accomplish the same goal with transportation funds already paid for by Measure R.  Instead, Team Cedillo is betting on a long-shot California State grant to do similar at a much higher price for just five blocks of North Figueroa.

 

Five whole blocks of Complete Streets infrastructure that ignore the 33 other blocks of Figueroa in CD1.

Five whole blocks of Complete Streets infrastructure that ignore the 36 other blocks of Figueroa in CD1 where most driver verses pedestrian / cyclist collisions occur.

 

According to Bruins, Team Cedillo plans to do a weekend pop-up demonstration event for four blocks of Figueroa over an upcoming weekend as soon as March. What’s worrisome is that unlike the Great Streets initiative in other City of Los Angeles neighborhoods where the Mayor’s office has taken the lead, this particular project on Figueroa is being led by Cedillo’s office. If any of their previous efforts are an indication, the Great Streets initiative in Team Cedillo’s hands means that Highland Park’s Figueroa won’t likely get one.  But the kicker of the evening came with Bruins’ news that Team Cedillo would like us to do outreach to Figueroa businesses and try and sell them on this street plan they are putting forth. (Again, this theme of absolute consensus that Cedillo keeps using as an excuse.) No surprise, the room with mostly veterans of this Figueroa battle, were not receptive to Eric Bruins proposal to do outreach for the CD1 office.

It seems odd to many observers and activists that LACBC would be willing to work with Cedillo’s office considering their incompetency thus far, and how this project does little to help fulfill the 2010 LA Bike Plan that so many generations of LACBC members and staff worked for so many years to achieve. Is chasing incrementalism worth our trouble when all it takes is for ONE PERSON to sign a work-order that lets LADOT do their job? Maybe we are wrong, but has Team Cedillo done anything up to this point that shows they are worthy of our trust? We are understandably tired of being played.

The question at this point is: Do we kowtow and put our energies into helping Team Cedillo’s attempt to get this doubtful State of California grant that could fund five blocks sometime after Late 2017? Or do we put our energies into replacing Cedillo with someone who will allow LADOT to complete the approved and already-funded pedestrian-friendly Road Diet and Figueroa Bike Lanes when he comes up for re-election in 2017?

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “The Year 2017

  1. It is outrageous that Team Cedillo are “mystified” about the problems so many in the community have with him. They are playing Eric Bruins. He has not been a part of this for the past few years. Cedillo’s plan is a non-starter. If he dares to hold a dress rehearsal I don’t know what I am going to do but it won’t be done in the spirit of cooperation and support that is for darn sure. Sitting in the same room as a bunch of stuffed animals that collect paychecks from Poppa Gil is not a real achievement. 5 blocks of baloney in 2017 at an inflated cost is not a victory. Burn this plan to the ground and kick this fool Cedillo out of office in 2017.

  2. Crazy idea: we get behind this project. If this were how they entered their first year, embracing this “phase I” we would support it. It is only because he shut down the road diet that there is incentive to oppose this. We should advocate the road diet implementation immediately and then have this small segment upgraded IF the money is found.

    Getting something in the “great streets” corridor does not mean we stop pushing for the rest of Figueroa. The stats are on our side. Sadly, people will continue to get hurt and potentially killed south of the corridor. Those injuries will be impossible to ignore. Who knows, maybe this could be a turning point for Team Cedillo. It’s a gamble, to be sure. On one hand, we could cheerlead this and maybe some positive press and fuzzy ribbon cutting will get Cedillo to see things differently. Maybe he’ll get the safe streets bug and want to see further street safety improvements. On the other hand, this could be a clever way to divert our attention during his election year and sneak in a second term without having done anything on Fig. We can cheer this bike path to nowhere but if road diet is not in south of Great Streets corridor by mid-2016, we mobilize for whoever will run against him and/or continue to stage die-in’s at his home or the home of Louis Reyes and Sharon Lowe.

  3. Pingback: Figueroa Street and Bad Press | Dale's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s